Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 02:27

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
CFPB enforcement lead resigns, slams ‘attack’ on core mission in departure email - CNN
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Inside J.J. Spaun's Arizona Home as He Claims Surprising U.S. Open Win - Realtor.com
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
More studies show diet and nutrition are important in fighting cancer - WTOP
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Tucker Barnhart Elects Free Agency - MLB Trade Rumors
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Common Antibiotic Found To Tame Blood Pressure in Surprising New Role - SciTechDaily
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
How can someone get patrons on Patreon if they are a beginner artist?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
The Biggest Pokémon Card Crashers And Climbers This Week - June 2 - IGN
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Is the media protecting Kamala Harris?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
I test TVs for a living — and I recommend these 2 TVs above everything else - Tom's Guide